998 presidential staff disappointing; gov’t must review it – CDD

15

The Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana) has expressed disappointment over the New Patriotic Party (NPP) government’s decision to ‘over-staff’ the presidency despite concerns raised by the public over the earlier appointment of 110 ministers and deputies.

In a statement copied to citinewsroom.com, the CDD called on Parliament to thoroughly assess the list presented by the presidency last week with the view of depopulating it by removing persons with vague positions and superfluous roles.

The Presidency has come under intense public criticism as it once against broke another record of having 998 staff serving at the presidency, the highest ever by any president.

Many have accused the president of recruiting party foot-soldiers among other members to serve irrelevant roles.

Although the government has tried to justify the number, many organizations including IMANI Africa have condemned the move.

According to CDD-Ghana, “The Council of State must take its consultative role seriously and counsel the President appropriately concerning over-staffing at the Presidency, including the associated fiscal costs and the unfavourable
perception it creates of profligacy in the conduct of the business of government at the seat of the
Presidency.”

Read CDD-Ghana’s full statement below:

CDD-GHANA CALLS FOR ACTION AGAINST GROWING SUPER-SIZED PRESIDENTIAL STAFF AND
RETINUE

The publication last week of the list of presidential staffers for 2017 submitted to Parliament has revived the intense
public debate over the size of government.

The 2017 list shows a total of 998 persons employed at the Presidency.
The Ghana Center for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana) has taken due cognizance of the fact that the
published list covers both civil/public servants and presidential appointees serving under various designations at
the Presidency.

Nonetheless, the Center finds the trend towards locating or attaching a large number of workers
and staffers to the presidency deeply worrying. The Center is especially disappointed at the President’s decision to
continue this trend of overstaffing at the Presidency, given the public concerns raised over his appointment last year
of 110 Ministers and Deputy Ministers.

CDD-Ghana is also disappointed that neither the Council of State nor Parliament has seen fit to rein in this growing
indifference of successive administrations to the fiscal cost of a super-sized presidential staff and retinue. Although
the role of the Council of State in the staffing of the Presidency is, under the applicable statute, only consultative,
the point of inserting the Council in the process is presumably to enable it counsel the President in its staffing
decisions, including, we would expect, in the size, where it appears excessive.

Similarly, the point of statutorily requiring the President to submit a list of the employees at the Presidency to the Parliament on an annual basis is not merely for the sake of informing Parliament but to enable Parliament, on the basis of that information, to raise any appropriate questions and concerns it might have over staffing with the Presidency.

This is an especially important role for Parliament, as staffing numbers have direct fiscal implications.

CDD-Ghana finds unpersuasive the defense that the listed presidential office personnel all play different and
necessary roles at the Presidency. In the case of the civil service personnel, it is not clear why many of the agencies
for which they presumably work must be located at the Presidency. A good number are functionally best situated
within one or the other existing Ministry or Department.

In some other cases, it is not at all clear why those agencies must continue to exist. With regard to the political staffers, one notices from the list a large number of personnel with vaguely defined and unclear roles as well as many instances of a duplication of roles. Not only does this tend to undermine efficiency and discipline in the running of the Presidency, it also undermines the credibility of the President’s pledge to protect the public purse by ensuring judicious use of scarce state resources.

With the President championing a ‘Ghana Beyond Aid’ agenda, a vision many Ghanaians appear to have
embraced, there is widespread expectation that the Presidency would lead the way toward that noble goal by
signaling through its conduct an end to profligacy and an exceptional commitment to economy in the expenditure
of public resources.

CDD-Ghana is equally unpersuaded by the argument that the size of the President’s political staff is justified
because the President has a big agenda to push through. We do not believe that the size of a party’s or president’s
election manifesto must necessarily determine the size of its government.

Such a proposition, if accepted, would lead us down an untenable path, as parties and presidential candidates would be motivated to outdo one another in a “manifesto war” and, then, once elected, proceed to justify their super-sized staffs as necessary to prosecute their grand manifestos.

CDD-Ghana believes that, for effective governance and long-term development, including continuity in
implementation of government programs and programmes, what the country needs, and what successive
governments must invest in, is not more and more short-lived partisan appointees at the Presidency but a strong,
capable, well-staffed, efficient, and disciplined civil service, at both the national and subnational levels.

Omitting to rebuild the capacity of our weak civil service and choosing, instead, to place reliance on party cadres is not in the ultimate best interest of the country, as it over-politicizes the business of government and demoralizes and further weakens the capacity of the public administration.

In light of the foregoing, CDD-Ghana urges:
 Parliament, in the immediate term, to review the list submitted by the Presidency and demand additional information and clarity as to the precise roles and duties of the many political personnel listed with uninformative and vague job titles as well as require a disclosure of the salaries and emoluments attached to the listed positions. In the medium to long term, Parliament must review the Presidential Office Act, along with the Civil Service Act (as amended), with a view to depopulating the Presidency of the many needless agencies that currently fall within its organogram.

CDD-Ghana believes that, for effective governance and long-term development, including continuity in
implementation of government programs and programmes, what the country needs, and what successive
governments must invest in, is not more and more short-lived partisan appointees at the Presidency but a strong,
capable, well-staffed, efficient, and disciplined civil service, at both the national and subnational levels.

Omitting to rebuild the capacity of our weak civil service and choosing, instead, to place reliance on party cadres is not in the ultimate best interest of the country, as it over-politicizes the business of government and demoralizes and further weakens the capacity of the public administration.

In light of the foregoing, CDD-Ghana urges:
 Parliament, in the immediate term, to review the list submitted by the Presidency and demand additional information and clarity as to the precise roles and duties of the many political personnel listed with uninformative and vague job titles as well as require a disclosure of the salaries and emoluments attached to the listed positions. In the medium to long term, Parliament must review the Presidential Office Act, along with the Civil Service Act (as amended), with a view to depopulating the Presidency of the many needless agencies that currently fall within its organogram.

By: Jonas Nyabor/citinewsroom.com/Ghana

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.